So far for this project, I have five women I intend to interview and include within the finished product. Due to the LCA ethics policy, I'm unable to name each of the women by name, so will be referring to them from here on out as the first initial of their first name. I sent each of these women my initial message (to which i recieved confirmation of wanting to participate from each of them) and later sent the opening email and attached questions.
I wondered at this point if it would be appropriate to name each woman and the different axes of identity that made them, as a grouping, varied. However I don't feel as though it's neccisassry to identify each individual quirks. I've made a list of some of these as a group however, rather than individual. Given the sensitivity of some of these axes, I also didn't want to publish or use any information the subjects may not have felt comfortable sharing. I stated in my email that any response from this point may be recorded on my blog for evidence, but no data they do not want sharing shall be shared.
WOMEN BEING INTERVIEWED INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THOSE OF THE FOLLOWING NATURES;
-bisexual women
-women of colour
-working class
-middle class
-20s age range
-30s age range
-teenagers
-white women
-straight women
-trans-women
-non binary women
-pansexual women
-disabled women
-northern women
-southern women
I'm hoping with a range of women covering so many varying axes of identity, a range in realities, concerns and issues can be discussed and expressed. I'm hopeful for the answers I'll get!
No comments:
Post a Comment